Search MasonicTravels.com

May 12, 2008

History of True Blue Lodge No.98 G.R.C.

History of True Blue Lodge No.98 G.R.C.

The Charter Members of True Blue Lodge were all former members of Western Light Lodge No. 7, P.R. The first communication of the lodge was held on the evening of March 5th, 1858, by authority of a dispensation issued by the Ancient Grand Lodge of Canada. At this time True Blue was numbered 62. The Grand Master was Sir Alan Napter Mc Nab. V.W. Bro. William Graham was True Blue's first ruling master, and also its guiding hand for a considerable number of years thereafter.

On March 5, 1858, the first candidate, Mr. William Curliss, was initiated into the mysteries of Free Masonry.

The lodge's first home was in one of the upper rooms of the Masonic Arms Hotel which stood on the location of the present Imperial Bank, and this continued to be its meeting place for about 16 years.

The first election was held on June 4th, 1858, at which the following were chosen: W.M. William Graham; Treasurer Bro. Gilbert Gilmore; Tyler Bro. John McGeary.

The Installation was held on St. John's Day, June 24th at high noon. V.W. Bro. Solomon Stogdill installed Bro. Graham in the chair of King Solomon, S.D. - Bro. Robert Dick, J.W. - Bro. Wm. Lynas, Sec. - Bro. Wm. Morris, S.D. - Bro. James Murray, J.D. - Bro. B. Hall, I.G. - Bro. Wm. Curliss, S.S. - Bro. Wm. Johnston, J.S. - Bro. Robert Booth plus above Officers.

Two F.C. Degrees and one Master Mason's Degree were then conferred. Lodge closed at 8 pm.

About this time two Grand Lodges then operating in Canada united, and on July 14. 1858, a Warrant of Constitution was issued by the Grand Lodge of Canada in the Province of Ontario, assigning the rank of No. 98 to True Blue. The charter has been the lodge's authority to work since then. The charter of True Blue is unique in that it has embodied in it a copy of the original dispensation, with the names of the two Grand Masters, has two numbers and is known as a Warrant of Dispensation.

In June 1859 the lodge received a proposal of Union from Western Light Lodge.

In December 1870, the three chats of King Solomon' Temple were purchase and still adorn the walls of True Blue Lodge.

On July 1st, 1876, a Dominion Day picnic was held with members of Blackwood and Robinson Lodges.

In 1904, True Blue became the Mother Lodge of Peel Lodge No. 468 in Caledon East.

In 1943, the D.D.G.M. R.W. Bro. Howard E. Richmond presented the lodge with the magnificent silk banner inscribed " Western Light Lodge No. 7, P.R. which had been kept in the archives of Grand Lodge and now has an honoured place in the East in True Blue Lodge.

"May the memory of the solid foundation laid by our 'ancient brethren" over one hundred years ago and the continuing labours of those worthy Masons who added to the superstructure inspire us to more noble and unselfish dedication to the Five Points of Fellowship so that our Most Noble Science may shine with Undiminished Lustre throughout the years and add its share to bringing Peace, Harmony and Brotherhood to the world".

On March 5th, 2008 celebrated its 150th Anniversary by re-creating the Lodge atmosphere at its creation. The Lodge was lit only be Eight Candles, representing the eight founding members of the Lodge and a First Degree was performed as the minutes of the first meeting indicated. The M.W. Bro. Allan J. Petrisor, Grand Master of Canada, A. F. & A. M., in the Province of Ontario was in attendance along with many past and present Grand Lodge Officers among which was R. W. Bro. Rea Gibson, D.D.G.M. of Toronto York District.

A memorial experience for all in attendance Thank you

Contributed by: Bro C. Plante

May 10, 2008

The Cubit – Measuring Scale

The Cubit – Measuring Scale

cu·bit
–noun
an ancient linear unit based on the length of the forearm, from elbow to the tip of the middle finger, usually from 17 to 21 in. (43 to 53 cm).

[Origin: 1325–75; ME, OE < style="font-size:130%;">Cubit's in the ancient world:

The cubit is one of the first recorded units of length used by ancient people. Depending on where in the world you live the cubit had a slightly different meaning. Generally speaking the cubit refers to the length between your elbow and the tip of the middle finger. Generally speaking a cubit is 45.72 centimetres or 18 inches (2) but this figure obviously changes based on who's forearm is being measured.

The earliest recorded standard measure was called the Royal Cubit which was 20.61 to 20.63 inches in length. This measurement was used in early construction and is known to be used in the building of the Step Pyramid of Dioser around 2,700BC. (3)

Different measurements based on Cubits: (4)

Egypt:

1 ordinary cubit = 6 Palms or 24 digits (450mm)
1 royal cubit or “meh” = 7 Palms or 28 digits (524mm)
100 royal cubits = 1 “khet” (52.4m)

Mesopotamia:

1 cubit varied between 522mm to 532mm
1 foot was equal to 2/3 cubit
1 digit was equal to 1/30 cubit

Persia:

1 cubit (“arasni”) was 520mm to 543mm
½ cubit (“vitasti” or “charac”)
2 cubits is 1 “guz”

Roman Empire:

18 inches = 1 cubit (“cubitus”)

Biblical References:

1 digit (“esba”) = 18.75mm
4 digits = 1 palm (“tophah”)
24 digits or 6 palms = 1 small cubit or (“amma”)
7 palms = 1 old cubit

Bro Ken's Freaky-Deaky Cubit: (5)

Right Cubit = 17.5 inches
Left Cubit = 17 inches

The Pillars at King Solomons Temple:

Teachings would have us believe that the Pillars at King Solomons Temple were 18 Cubits in Height, 12 cubits in circumference, hollow brass and a hands breadth thickness of approximately 4 inches. All topped off by a 5 cubit chapiter.

Measuring with the biblical reference lengths of an old cubit this would translate to:

1 digit = 18.75 mm
1 palm = 75 mm
1 cubit = 525 mm (0.525 m or 1.722 feet)
18 cubit = 9,450 mm (9.45 m or 31 feet)
Add the additional 5 cubits for the chapiters

18 cubit (pillar) + 5 cubit (chapiter) = 23 Cubits or 12.075 m (39.616 feet)

I have to admit that I'm surprised at the scale of the pillars. If you based the pillars on the modern measure of 18 inches per cubit you would find the pillar slightly smaller, but still massive in size.


Refs:
1 – Dictionary.com Unabridged V1.1 2006
2 – Google Calculator
3 – Wikipedia – Cubit – The Egyptian Royal Cubit and Sumerian Nippur cubit
4 – Antiquity and Bible – Jack Proot (website)
5 - Measured my arms on May 7, 2008

May 9, 2008

Beginning Freemasonry in South Africa

IN THE BEGINNING

The Southern point of Africa, the Cape of Good Hope, was opened up by the Dutch East India Company as a trading station to supply ships on the route to the East Indies with fresh produce. Freemasonry in the Netherlands, founded in 1756, was expanding rapidly and, with many masters of ships being Freemasons, it was natural for a Lodge to be founded at this halfway station under the banner of the Grand East of the Netherlands (G.E.N.). The eyes of the G.E.N. were focussed on the Cape as early as 1764 and in 1771 Brother Abraham van der Weijde, the captain of a sailing vessel plying between Holland and the East Indies, was appointed Deputy Grand Master Abroad, with the necessary authority to found Lodges, subject to subsequent ratification by Grand Lodge. He arrived at the Cape on the 24th April 1772 and called a meeting of Brethren, to which ten Brethren responded under his chairmanship. Ten days later he issued a warrant for the founding of Lodge De Goede Hoop (Lodge Good Hope) as Lodge No. 12 on the register of the G.E.N., which was ratified on 1st September 1772.

SOCIAL AND RELIGIOUS EQUALITY

For its existence, the Lodge depended on visitors and, while conferring several Degrees, it failed to attract the local residents as members, mainly because of the rigid social and religious attitudes of the confined Cape society, which consisted primarily of two broad classes: the Company official and free burgher. Due to rigid Company policy, Company servants were not permitted to trade nor own land until they were released from their contracts, after which they were allowed to settle in the Cape and become free burghers. The Masonic philosophy of equality in the Lodge violated the structure in the Cape where difference in rank between Company officials and free burghers was practiced. Religious interference was also widespread. As a result the Lodge went into recess in April 1781 to be opened again in 1794 as more prominent persons of the Company were attracted, such as Johannes Andries Truter, who would later become Chief Justice of the Cape. This offered some protection from the Company and the pulpit. Where previously members were of a transient nature, more and more initiates were locally born and primarily resident in the Cape, which offered stability.

Since its revival in 1794, Lodge De Goede Hoop has remained active and is Lodge No 1 on the register of the Grand Lodge of South Africa. It has been instrumental in the establishment of Lodges under the jurisdiction of other Grand Lodges in South Africa.

THE DUTCH WELCOME THE BRITISH

Political circumstances because of the wars between Holland, France and Spain on the one hand and England on the other hand resulted in various occupation forces being established at the Cape and this had a definite effect on Freemasonry in the Cape. Under British occupation in 1795, military Lodges attached to British regiments arrived at the Cape, bringing new interest in the Craft but not the establishment of new local Lodges. Further impetus was given to Freemasonry by the subsequent take over of the Batavia Republic in 1802 and with the arrival of Jacob de Mist, a Deputy Grand Master in Holland who became the first Deputy Grand Master National, Netherlandic Constitution, in the region. His first priority was to re- establish the Dutch presence in the Cape and one of the important avenues he used was Freemasonry. With the return of the British Military Lodges during the second occupation of the Cape Colony, the Commander in Chief was a Mason and the Deputy Grand Master National saw him as an ally and welcomed him to Lodge De Goede Hoop as protector.

ENGLISH, SCOTTISH AND IRISH CONSTITUTION LODGES ARE FORMED

However, the influx of English speaking members into the Lodge brought tension and the inevitable split, when English speaking members broke away in 1811 to form the first English Lodge at the Cape: British Lodge. This was the first permanent Masonic involvement in the territory by the United Grand Lodge of England. Political circumstances caused the Great Trek when thousands of burghers moved North and, together with the general economic circumstances, had an adverse effect on Freemasonry. Relative prosperity in the 1850's in the Cape resulted in the influx of English settlers, development of the Eastern coast and the Natal Colony and a revitalized Craft. English Freemasonry spread to the Eastern parts and Dutch Freemasonry moved into the hinterland, as far as the newly formed Republics of the Orange Free State and Transvaal. Here again, the use of English in the Dutch Lodges created problems and resulted in the formation in 1860 of the first Lodge under the Scottish Constitution, Lodge Southern Cross. The first Lodge under the Irish Constitution, Lodge Abercorn, was formed in 1896. There were now four Constitutions at labour in Southern Africa.

PROPOSALS TO FORM A UNITED GRAND LODGE

As early as 1875 there were calls for a United Grand Lodge to be formed, where all Masons would be able to find a home. Again in 1892 there was a similar move but when 500 Masons gathered in Kimberley for that purpose, the proposal to form a United Grand Lodge was defeated by a small majority. Similar initiatives were started again later but all to no avail.

It must be said that the four Constitutions worked together in great harmony and many Masons held cross membership. Some Temples were even jointly owned by Lodges of different Constitutions while many Benevolent Funds were jointly run. Some Lodges of the Irish and Scottish Constitution even formed Lodges working in Afrikaans. The situation understandably deteriorated during the Anglo-Boer war but there are many tales of Masons from opposite sides remembering their Masonic oath and saving their Brethren, going so far as to spare the Temples from destruction. Perhaps as a result of political circumstances, the upsurge of Afrikanerdom and the growing campaign for a South African Republic, the striving for a South African Grand Lodge again gained momentum.

THE GRAND LODGE OF SOUTHERN AFRICA IS FORMED

The failure of making any progress in the formation of a United Grand Lodge caused some Brethren of the Netherlandic Constitution to form an entirely South African "Grand Lodge", under the title of the "South African Order of Masonry". Its first president, officers and Brethren were invested on 13 March 1952. Its formation was irregular because official procedure was not followed and, consequently, the four Constitutions operating in South Africa forbade their members to attend the meetings of the new Order. The movement struggled on with its one Lodge until the formation of the Grand Lodge of Southern Africa in 1961, when it dissolved and its 61 remaining members signed an oath of allegiance to the newly formed Grand Lodge. It is ironical that the formation of a South African Grand Lodge, after all the efforts locally, is actually attributable to events in Masonic Grand Lodges in Europe.

It must be recalled that, during the Nazi occupation of Europe, Freemasonry was virtually destroyed. Freemasonry in Holland ceased to exist and resulted in the South African component, being on a strong footing, assisting in the re-establishing of the Grand East of the Netherlands after the war. Grand Lodges all over Europe were starting to re-emerge after the war and the problem arose over which Grand Lodges should be recognized as "regular". In his endeavour to further the formation of Grand Lodges, the Grand Master of the G.E.N. proposed to accept Grand Orients, which did not comply with ancient landmarks, the two most important being the belief in a living God and the presence of a Bible during the labours of a Lodge. This resulted in grave disagreements with the Grand Lodges of England, Ireland and Scotland, who threatened to withdraw recognition of the G.E.N. This would have serious effects on the G.E.N. Lodges in South Africa who were in close co-operation with Lodges under these Constitutions. Furthermore the leaders of the Netherlandic Lodges were not aware of the dark clouds which were building up.

When a break in the relationship between the G.E.N. and the three Grand Lodges became imminent, the English Grand Secretary advised Districts in South Africa of the situation. This caused consternation because, as already stated, there was a great measure of co-operation between the Lodges of the four Constitutions: Benevolent Funds and Temples had joint ownerships. Colonel Colin Graham Botha, who was at the time Deputy Grand Master National in South Africa, wrote a letter to the Grand Master, M. W. Brother Davidson, expressing his concern. Coincidentally, the Grand Master wrote to him on the same day advising that it would probably be better to form an independent Grand Lodge of Southern Africa.

FIRST GRAND MASTER OF GLSA

With this seed sown, intense negotiations took place - it was just a matter of time before this Grand Lodge came into being. The three Grand Lodges initially tried to steer the negotiations in the direction of a United Grand Lodge but on 22 April 1961, the Grand Lodge of Southern Africa was formed, with Colonel Colin Graham Botha as its first Grand Master. One Lodge in South Africa elected to remain with the G.E.N., giving lie to its name "Eendrag Maak Mag" (Unity is Strength), while the seven Lodges in (the then) Rhodesia also remained with the G.E.N. In 1981 it was realized that the Grand Lodge would have no jurisdiction outside the boundaries of the Republic of South Africa and, with the consent of the three Grand Lodges, the name was changed to: The Grand Lodge of South Africa.


Written By: Author unknown

May 8, 2008

Peace and Harmony Prevails

Peace and Harmony Prevails

Living in Charleston, SC affords a Mason who enjoys visiting other lodges the opportunity to visit a large selection of different lodges all within a 30 minute drive of each other. Especially during the first two weeks of the month a Mason could conceivably visit a meeting of a different lodge or appendant body every night of the week. The opportunities for meeting and fellowshipping with brethren are sometimes staggering. In the act of availing myself of this Charlestonian Masonic opportunity I had a uniquely wonderful Masonic experience this past Thursday May the first.


I was visiting Pythagorean Lodge, which I frequently do. I barely got there before the lodge room door would be closed and as I signed the visitor section of the attendance log, I noticed a uniquely Germanic name. Looking over to his lodge affiliation I read: Todtenkopf und Phoenix - Berlin. My father having been a POW in World War 2 in Germany, I had instilled in me from my father an interest in most things German from an early age. I was excited to have the chance to meet and greet a German brother, especially in Charleston of all places. I found him and talked with him long enough to learn he was Junior Warden of his lodge (called 2nd Warden in Germany) before the craft was called to order. After we went through the routine opening ritual and introductions the Master said he was especially honored to introduce 2 visitors – the first was the brother from Germany. The second was a brother who was there from Israel to see his son take his first step in Masonry. He then made us aware that the following day (Friday 2May08) was Holocaust Memorial Day.


Under what other circumstances would a 60 year-old Israeli and a Berliner sit in peace and harmony with a roomful of Americans and all be perfectly at ease except in a Masonic Lodge? What a learning experience for us all. Regardless of any enmity that may exist outside the walls of the lodge, within the walls of a lodge we are all brothers first. Religious differences, political differences, personal prejudices, they all are insignificant when viewed in the context of our brotherhood. So also then should any differences between us within our own lodges be viewed in the same context. We say our order brings together men who otherwise might have remained at a perpetual distance. We shouldn’t let what petty differences that do exist divide us. We shouldn’t cling to the fairy tales of the past when the light of logical truth has exposed them to be such. We should allow ourselves to embrace the preponderance of similarities between us all and ignore the minor differences. Otherwise we will be forced to admit that we really do just study the ritual to be able to recite it, not in order to obey it. If a Jew and a German can meet on the level and part on the square in a Masonic lodge, what could possibly be worthy of dividing us?

Contributed by: Brother Tom Lewis

May 7, 2008

Mutual Admiration

Mutual Admiration

Something my wife said today at lunch got me thinking. She characterized the Masons as a “mutual admiration society”. She’s been around Masonry most of her life. She was a Rainbow girl, her grandparents were in Masonry and Eastern Star, but her parents aren’t into the Masonic experience and the characterization she voiced actually originated with them. I know my suddenly getting back involved with Masonry after so many years of just paying dues has been pretty overwhelming for her, and it’s hard for anyone on the outside to really get what Masonry is about. Even for some of us it can take years to begin to appreciate what it is about Masonry that has made it persevere over the centuries. And the more I think about it, although an oversimplification of all Masonry is, mutual admiration is a big part of it. And that’s not a bad thing.

The ways of virtue are beautiful. Masonry provides us all with a template from which to form an admirable life if we each choose to do so. Those who join our order but don’t “get it” and see no need to improve themselves for the overall benefit of humankind don’t stay around long. Just accepting the challenges of our obligations to strive to be better men is in itself admirable. Our Masonic trestle board holds the directions to form ourselves into useful living stones for that house not made with hands eternal in the heavens. It should follow as a natural process that we admire the ones we associate with who take up their Masonic working tools and strive to use them the best they can. As we begin to learn the various parts of the ritual, it’s natural that we feel admiration for those who already know it well. Knowledge is attained by degrees, and the learning process doesn’t suddenly end when we are charged as Master Masons. The brothers who know the ritual well know the inner meaning that comes with that knowledge – the wisdom that dwells in contemplation. Thus they help and encourage others to learn and grow as they have, and admire our efforts and progress as we do.

So on reflection, I don’t feel the need to dispute the characterization of Masonry as a mutual admiration society, or apologize for our admiration and encouragement of each other. My brothers are worthy of admiration. Looking around the lodge room during a meeting I see kind generous men filled with brotherly love. Associating with them encourages me to try harder to be more like them as we all “cultivate the great moral virtues set down on our Masonic trestle boards and improve in everything that is good, amiable and useful.”

Contributed by: Brother Tom Lewis

May 6, 2008

The Word Hele – Brief Origins

The Word Hele – Brief Origins

Hele
Hile\, v. t. To hide. See Hele. [Obs.] --Chaucer (1a))
"to hide, conceal; to keep secret." (1b)

From ancient German “hehlen”, “to conceal” (2)

This word proves a relation between modern Freemasonry and the ancient German Building Corporations (3)

Earliest known usage non-masonically of hele was in 825 AD (4)

First Masonic reference to hele was in the Cooke Manuscript in the early fifteenth century: “That he can hele the counsel of his fellows in lodge and in chambr and in every place where masons be.” (5)

Don't forget in the dark ages Britain was overrun by the Saxons - a tribe from Saxony which is part of what is now Germany. Old English is derived from old German/Saxon and the Welsh form of Gaelic. Example: the plural of brother in old English is brethren which is similar to how many German nouns are pluralized rather than adding an "s" as in modern English. (6)

Refs:
1a – Websters Dictionary
1b – Oxford English Dictionary
2 – A Dictionary of Freemasonry – R. Macoy
3 – A Dictionary of Freemasonry – R. Macoy
4 – Oxford English Dictionary
5 – Freemasons' Guide and Compendium – B. E. Jones
6 - Info contributed by Bro T Lewis (email May 7.08)

May 5, 2008

Masonry in the History of the Philippines

Masonry in the History of the Philippines
By Bro. Nicolas G. Ricafrente, GM

Masonry has existed in the Philippines since 1856, when the first Masonic Lodge was established in the country. This lodge was called “Primera Luz Filipina” established by a Spanish naval officer, Jose Malcampo in the province of Cavite. Although organized under a Portuguese Grand Orient and exclusively for Spaniards, its formation marked the introduction of Masonry in Philippine soil.

Philippine history is rich in the contributions and role of Masonry and Masons in the country. The propagation of the ideals of democracy is perhaps their biggest contribution. Our heroes Jose Rizal, Marcelo del Pilar, Mariano Ponce, Graciano Lopez Jaena, Emilio Aguinaldo, Andres Bonifacio, Apolinario Mabini and many other Filipino patriots were all Masons.

It may be ironic, but significant that it was in Spain itself where Jose Rizal and his fellow Filipino expatriates internalized the idea of democracy. They joined Masonry and realized for the first time that they were treated as equals by their Spanish brothers. Rizal, del Pilar, Mariano Ponce and others saw the liberalism pervading in the very seat of colonial power, in stark contrast to the manner in which the Philippine colonial government was being run by the friar-influenced Spanish governors. They formed a propaganda movement and published a newspaper, La Solidaridad that exposed the anomalies in the Philippines and advocated reforms.

Jose Rizal wrote the novel Noli Me Tangere that exposed the abuses and avarice of the friars in the Philippines. In 1892 he and other ilustrados organized the La Liga Filipina to actively work for reforms. Rizal was arrested and exiled in Dapitan in Mindanao. The call for reforms repeatedly rejected and violently suppressed, later transformed into more militant actions. The Katipunan was organized; highly Masonic in structure and in its system of admission of members. It advocated total independence from Spain. It plotted a revolution.

Katipunan founders Andrés Bonifacio, Ladislao Diwa and Teodoro Plata were all members of La Liga Filipina and were influenced by the nationalistic ideals of the Propaganda Movement in Spain. In the last week of August 1896, shortly after its discovery by the Spanish authorities, the Philippine revolution broke out.

The influence of Masons and Masonry on nationalism was not confined in Spain. Once the Filipinos were allowed access to lodges established under the Grand Spanish Orients, Masonry flourished and nationalistic fervor grew. Filipino Masons found support and protection even from colonial governors and Spanish government officials.

The history of Masonry in the Philippines tells us of the liberal regime of a Mason, Governor General Carlos Maria dela Torre, who was sent to the country in 1869 during the age of liberalism in Spain. It was after Queen Isabela II was deposed and King Amadeus of Savoy, a fellow Mason was installed. Dela Torre became a friend of the Filipinos; encouraged free speech, abolished censorship of the press and fostered free discussion of political problems. He displayed benevolence by pardoning rebels who spearheaded an agrarian uprising in Cavite. He supported the Filipinization of the parishes.

Governor General Carlos dela Torre implemented the educational decrees of another Mason, Minister of the Colonies Segismundo Moret, providing for the secularization of education and government control over certain educational institutions in the Philippines. Fearing that his attitude would promote nationalist tendencies among the Filipinos, and encourage the duplication of the Masonically led revolt in Spain, the friars conspired to remove him in 1871.

In 1885 Emilio Terrero y Perinat a 33rd degree Mason, was appointed Governor General to the Philippines. He revived the liberal measures started by Governor General dela Torre and together with fellow Masons Jose Centeno, acting Civil Governor of Manila and Benigno Quiroga, Director General for Civil Administration, tried to cleanse the government of friar dictates and influence.

When Rizal returned to the country on August 5, 1887, after his five-year stay in Spain, copies of his explosive novel Noli Me Tangere were already being circulated. The Archbishop of Manila had asked Terrero to ban the book immediately but the Governor General instead summoned Rizal for interview. After two meetings, Rizal earned the admiration of Governor General Terrero who, believing that he was in extreme danger assigned a lieutenant of the Civil Guards, Jose Taviel de Andrade as his bodyguard.

The novel continued to circulate and even enjoyed immense popularity especially after Terrero ignored the recommendation of the Permanent Commission on Censorship that it be absolutely prohibited. Governor General Emilio Terrero’s three year term ended in 1888 and was not renewed.

The impact and influence of Masons and Masonry in the struggle for freedom can not be denied. This is probably even more evident in the fact that our heroes were descendants of Continental Grand Orients; nurtured in the same brand of Masonry that inspired the Masonically led 1789–1799 French Revolution and the Spanish uprising of 1868. Katipunan Supremo Andres Bonifacio and General Emilio Aguinaldo were said to have studied the history of the French Revolution. Aguinaldo’s revolutionary theme, Equality, Fraternity and Liberty was definitely inspired by the French revolution.

General Emilio Aguinaldo rose to become the principal rallying personality of the revolution; united the erstwhile divided forces and succeeded in liberating the key provinces and cities in the Archipelago. Independence was declared on June 12, 1898 in Kawit, Cavite, followed by the creation the first republican form of government in Asia. The national flag was unfurled and the national anthem, the Marcha Nacional was first played by a brass band. The first Philippine Constitution was subsequently drafted by an assembly largely composed of Masons in Malolos, Bulacan.

Filipinos were however, denied the fruits of freedom when the United States which had declared war against Spain on April 21, 1898 signed the Treaty of Paris with Spain on December 10, 1898 which was ratified on February 6, 1899. In this treaty, Spain ceded the Philippines for $20,000,000.

The Philippine-American war erupted on February 4, 1899. Aguinaldo was captured in 1901; the Americans declared total victory, and the Philippines became a colony of the United States.

Emilio Aguinaldo, made a Mason at Pilar Lodge in Imus; founder of Magdalo Lodge in Kawit, and first president of the Philippine Republic, looking back at the revolution said:

“The successful Revolution of 1896 was Masonically inspired, Masonically led, and Masonically executed. And I venture to say that the first Philippine Republic, of which I was its humble president, was an achievement we owe largely, to Masonry and the Masons.”


Bro. Ric Alvarez AGS
IGLPI-District Center for Research and Information
BBL 4 Masonic Center Cavite City, Philippines
Monday 01-28-2008